Friday, November 11, 2005

زندگی وفا نداره

این روزها اگه میبینین کمتر مینویسم به خاطر اینه که اولین دفاعم در راهه و یه دنیا کار نکرده هست که تو این دو هفته باید انجام بشه.
قابل توجه اونهایی که ازژاپن وبلاگ من رو میخونن و بهنام فخر جهانی رو میشناسن. دیروز بعد از سالها یه دوست از توکیو زنگ زد و گفت بهنام طی یه حادثه رانندگی فوت کرده! به همین راحتی... ظاهرا در جا فوت کرده. من خودم هیچ وقت نه بهنام رو دیده بودم نه خواهرش آرزو رو که از سال بالایی های من به حساب میاد. آرزو یکی از ایرانی های موفقیه که خیلی ها اینور و اونور ژاپن اسمش رو شنیدن. خیلی حرفها در موردش هست و من نمیخوام ندیده در موردش قضاوت کنم.
حتما خیلی سخته که ببینی برادر هفت هشت سال کوچکتر از خودت تو کشوری که بجز تو کس دیگه ای براش نبوده یه دفعه از بین میره... به هر حال مراسم ختمی هست که روز شنبه برگزار میشه. اونهایی که میخوان برن یه تماس کوچک با من بگیرن
چیزی که این مدت فکر منو مشغول کرده اینه که تو کشوری که تصادف رانندگی واسه جمعیت صد و بیست میلیونیش به ندرت اتفاق می افته و مرگ در صانحه رانندگی بسیار به ندرت تر، چرا واسه جمعیت کمتر از چند صد نفری دانشجوی ایرانی اینقدر درصد حادثه و مرگ بالاس... تا حالا ننشستم آماری حساب کنم این درصد از درصد خود ژاپنی ها چقدر بالاتره ولی تو بالاتر بودنش شک ندارم
چرا همه فکر میکنیم مرگ مال همسایه اس! بابا مردن به سادگی نزدن قلبیه که اندازه مشت دسته! اومدنش هم اصلا نیازی به گذشتن شصت سال از عمر نداره... یک ساعت دیگه ممکنه تو هم از بالا به جسد بی جان خودت خیره شده باشی
الان بهنام چه حالی داره؟ باورش میشه که دیگه نیست؟ کی میدونه

10 comments:

Behrooz said...

ناعمه جان، دو سال پیش هم کارگری ایرانی در استان چی‌با با موتور تصادف کرد و کشته شد. من واقعاً اطلاع ندارم که آمار مرگ و میر ایرانیان ِ ژاپن بر اثر حوادث رانندگی بیش‌تر از خود ژاپنی‌ها است یا نه. اما ظاهراً خیلی بالا است. این را هم گفته باشم که آمار مرگ و میر در ژاپن بر اثر حوادث رانندگی کم نیست. متوسط 3-4 سال گذشته از 10000 نفر در سال بیش‌تر بوده (دقیق یادم نیست اما در یادداشت‌هایم دقیق آن را دارم) که بیش‌تر هم جوان بوده‌اند و مهم‌ترین عامل سرعت زیاد و مستی در هنگام رانندگی عنوان شده.

Anonymous said...

don't you think that it is not right to talk like this about somebody that you don't know?
as you said yourslef, you may have heard a lot about somebody and you can't judge unless you are sure, but by writing this sentence about someone who you are giving also her name, you give your readers the impression that you have heard awful things about the person and you are indirectly speading the word that you even don't know whether it is true or not.
I know her quite well and I can assure you whatever people say about her is a bunch of nonsense. the sort of common nonsense that comes from those people who can not see anyone more successful than themselves. your post made me feel really bad about this.

myself said...

Dear Annonymous friend:
I was talking to my fiance about the sentence I wrote in Persian:
حرفهای زیادی در موردش هست
He agreed with you that the bad impression out of this sentence is stronger... The fact is though that I meant exactly what I wrote,which the English translation would be: "There are a lot of stories about her". And I suppose this sentence doesn't give any bad impression... Maybe I should have written:
داستان های مختلفی در موردش نقل میشه

I have heared good and bad stories both, about Arezo. I don't know her but I personally admire her for at least being so famous as an Iranian girl... The rest about her, I simply don't know.

About giving her name in my blog, people critisize Bush in their weblogs and do give his name! so I suppose as it is a free country I do have the right to criticize someone (even if I meant to) giving his/her name.

You said you know her and what ever others say is nonsense...I don't agree. You have your own opinion as every body else has.

You are not happy about my post but remember my friend, that I am writing this blog not because of you or any one else. You are more than welcome to let me know your opinions about mine, but if you are happy about me or mad at me or any thing else, it's absolutely up to you.

Anonymous said...

although I am not used to chain messages, however I need to give an answer to your comments:

First of all you can not compare talking about a politician with talking about an ordinary person. People have right to criticise a politician because they are responsible for the decisions they make, because they have power and they have authority over millions of peoples' lives. a wrong decision that a politician makes could destroy the whole world. but as for an ordinary individual, we have no right to criticise how they live their own personal lives. so your comparison with Bush is logically wrong in the first place....

and speaking of freedom, it seems that you still don't know what freedom means. Although we live in a free world, there is a very strict limit to our freedom and it is where our action could violate someone else's rights and their reputation. we are free as long as our own personal lives goes, but as soon as we act in a way to affect other individualts lives that is not freedom anymore... this is where the law steps in to protect people against the ones like you who don't know their limits.
and by the way, sorry to disappoint you but as a free human being I am absolutely free to step in and defend an innocent person's reputation even if you don't like it....

myself said...

Hi Again
I did never say I don't like you to defend an innocent person especially as it seems like you know a lot about LAW and ME, but your problem is you still don't understand that there has been no complaints against anyone!!! If I have any personal problem with Arezo I will go right into her and I am sure she is capable of defending herself! But I hope I someday meet her and talk about this post with her and see what her reaction would be.

I am here to talk about my opinions. I have never ment to offend any one unless he/she offends me, and in that case I will go straign into him/her...
But we all need to be calm when people speak about our weekness, remembering no one is perfect.So, you please keep up with visiting my blog and defending every single person I name in here, and I will definitely keep up with writing about whatever my true feeling says.

Anonymous said...

Well, I have been following the blog of Naemeh during the few last weeks and suppose it is the first time that a person is a little aggressive to one of her posts. I have some comments for both, Naemeh and the Anonymous commenter.
Firstly, I agree with the fiancé of Naemeh that the sentence she had used in her original post about that person (Arezo I mean), whom I do not know too, had a negative bias in Persian. But Naemeh said she had not meant for that negative point. So I think at that moment every thing should be ended. But…

Compared with writing about Bush, I think you can write and express your ideas about any thing and any one, Bush or any ordinary individual.
You, “Anonymous commenter”, remind me the government of Iran that says “The people of the country are free” but put the bloggers and journalists into the jail. You first give a definition for freedom but you can not accept any dissident idea and you put a hard line for freedom by yourself. It means you only like some good points about what and whom you like.
“Anonymous commenter”, if you talk about freedom of expressing ideas, then you should tolerate both agreed and disagreed opinions. However, as you had mentioned yourself, logically, freedom has a limit which is when our action could violate someone else’s rights or takes his/her freedom or affect other individuals’ lives. But I think you have confused the cases. You can write about any one whatever you like but does it really destroy her/his reputation? Who cares? (However as Naemeh said, I think she did not mean to do that in this case).
If any one cares and judges about some one only according to what you think or what you have written about, he /she should be somehow stupid and currently we are talking about wise people, like you. Don’t we?

So, this fact should be understood by people like you in the world, either politicians or ordinary individuals, every one can write and explain his/her ideas absolutely freely, and if any opposite group exist, they should answer logically, not to decrease such freedom, not to criticize , not to put in jail, not to kill and so one.

By the way, you told there are some kinds of law to stop some people like Naemeh for exactly what she said. Would you tell me more about that law?

Finally, it is interesting that an anonymous, as an angel, is looking up inside the weblogs to defend innocent people. I was thinking why you are anonymous. Don’t you think if you would be appeared with your real name and would bring some more reasons for your strong hypotheses (here about Arezo, for instance), instead of criticizing or only talking about your feeling about the post, you would have done your defence job more efficiently?

Anonymous said...

Naemeh and Mina,

I am very sorry that you both got me and whatever I said, completely wrong!

just as the last note, I have been living in the so called "Free world" for almost my whole life and I know what the laws are here in the west, so please don't try to teach me the laws.....

and by the way, did you know that here in the U.S. Arezoo could sue you just for the sentence you wrote about her, even if you didn't mean it?!

I have nothing more to say to you, because apparently we don't live in the same world.....

myself said...

And probably I can sue you for whatever you have written here about me and EVERYONE ELSE can sue you about what you said about their ideas... By the way is that the reason you keep your anonymity?!!!

PS. Glad not to be living in the same world with you!

Anonymous said...

well, no surprise that you proved once more that you don't get it!

They don't sue people for discussions and disagreements but they do sue people for ruining their reputation behind their back. they call this Gossip. You are gossipping you are not disagreeing with someone. You are talking behind someones back which is the most shallow and disgusting thing that a person, specially an educated one, could do.

Don't worry, there is no place for people like you in my world anyway, you are still too young for this. You must first learn the difference between gossipping and honest discussion and advice.

Introducing myself is totally out of question. Don't want to be the next topic for your gossippings, no thanks!

myself said...

I am afraid I can not let this conversation go on here 'cause otehrs are visiting this blog and thus a personal conversation between me and you doesn't seem appropriate.
I beleive every one who goes throw all this story from the begining to the end, can judge about if I have ever tried to gossip or not, or if a sentense of "There are a lot of stories about her", influences the reputation of a person!!!
As I did ask a third person's idea about my writing, maybe you can do the same and see how others would think reading word by word of my sentences.

If you are ready to talk about this matter, please send me an email and I will reply to you. otherwise from my side, this conversation is over.

Thank you for your time on this post though.